Employment Workplace Relations

Director, Philip Brewin is a specialist in Workplace Relations and heads our Workplace Relations Work Group.

Corporate and Business Law

The Nevett Ford Corporate and Business Law team has a wealth of experience and expertise and have established quality relationships with clients, including many small and medium business enterprises, across a wide range of industries.

Dispute Resolution ( Litigation)

Nevett Ford has wide experience in all manner of litigation.

Mediation

Mediation is a process and set of principles designed to manage and resolve disputes between parties. It is an efficient and effective method of dispute resolution that can help to preserve relationships through the intervention of a third party, known as a mediator.

Property Law

Nevett Ford has been conveying Victorian property for more than 150 years.

Monday, 22 May 2017

Reflections on the diverse and inclusive workplace


The former Sex Discrimination Commissioner Ms Elizabeth Broderick recently commented on diversity and inclusion in the workplace at a conference held by the Australian Human Resources Institute.
Here are some of the things she emphasised:
  1. If employees are to embrace change to make the workplace more diverse and inclusive then their employers need to lead the way.
  2. She urged the creation of safe spaces where employees could share their views in a respectful, empathetic setting that did not lead to recriminations.
  3. Don’t assume opponents of change have bad intentions. But they may see change as involving the loss of something that they have worked hard for and personally invested in.
  4. The diverse and inclusive workplace needs to deal with the perception, if not the fact, of loss of security, stability, belonging and rituals as well as the positive changes meant to encourage diversity and inclusion.
  5. She asked women who had been successful in challenging environments (“jocks in frocks”) whether they thought it was okay if their sisters or daughters had to go through the same experiences they did in order to succeed.
    For further advice on strategies to make your workplace diverse and inclusive please contact our team of workplace lawyers at Nevett Ford.
Image result for images of diversity and inclusion in workplace

Thursday, 11 May 2017

But do I HAVE to (make redundancy payments)?


Sing it with me, Bob Dylan: the times they are a changin’.

For one reason or another, your business is undergoing significant operational changes and you need to make some of your workforce redundant.

So, who do you make redundant, how do you do it properly and, most importantly, what do you have to pay them?
  1. Who you make redundant will depend on the reasons for the redundancy, as well as the size of your business and the nature of the restructure.
  2. The proper process and procedure to be followed will depend on the terms of the employment contract and/or applicable modern award or enterprise bargaining agreement. 
  3. Generally, you will not have to pay an employee redundancy pay in the following situations:
  1. The employee was employed on a casual or fixed-term contract;
  2. The employee has only been employed for less than 12 months; or
  3. The employee was an independent contractor.
There are some exceptions to this rule and then some exceptions to those exceptions.

Also, those exceptions are not the only exceptions.

Put simply, redundancy can be incredibly complicated.

Get it right and get the experts to talk you through it.

Penalties of up to $54,000 for corporations and $10,800 apply to directors for breaching their redundancy obligations under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) so it pays to pay up! (Though only when you have to, of course.)

Call the Workplace Relations team at Nevett Ford on (03) 9614 7111 and we’ll make it look easy. 
Related image
 



Monday, 1 May 2017

Overworked and Underpaid: The reality behind George Calombaris’ Greek tragedy

 

In a brilliant piece of spin worthy of an election campaign, George Calombaris openly admitted to underpaying past and present employees over $2.9 million – and has maintained his positive public image.
 
From the papers to The Project, the popular Masterchef appeared everywhere, apologised for profiting from his workers and continued to accept bookings at his numerous Greek restaurants across Melbourne.
 
You would be forgiven for thinking that it’s all that easy – underpay, apologise, back to business as usual – but be warned, this is the exception, not the rule. 
 
Businesses that are found to breach the Fair Work Act 2009 are liable to penalties of up to $54,000 for corporations, per breach. This means that if you underpay 100 employees, you are liable to 100 lots of penalties. Directors also face penalties of upon $10,800 per breach.  
 
Last year, the Fair Work Ombudsman recovered more than $2.2 million dollars in penalties alone for underpaid employees.
 
For George Calombaris’ Made Establishment empire, the repayments will be made quickly and easily, as the investors in the business have continued to pledge their financial support for the company.
 
Other businesses are not so lucky and have had to enter into voluntary administration after being ordered to back-pay their workers.
 
If you are unsure of how much to pay your employees in order to fulfil your obligations under the relevant employment contract, modern award or enterprise bargaining agreement, talk to someone who knows the answer! Contact the workplace relations team at Nevett Ford for all your employment law questions on (03) 9614 7111.

Tuesday, 25 April 2017

Not only the hair was short but the pay was too

A chain of Melbourne based hairdressing salons has been obliged to enter into an enforceable undertaking with the Fair Work Ombudsman to avoid prosecution after the agency uncovered widespread underpayment of employees.

In mid-2016 two former employees approached the FWO claiming that they had not been paid accrued annual leave on termination of employment.
One of the employees also alleged that penalty rates had not been paid for work on Sundays and public holidays.
The investigation the FWO conducted found that numerous employees had been underpaid a total of $88,000.00 over an eighteen month period.
The employer behind Best Cuts and Colours and What’s Up Hair agreed, as part of the enforceable undertaking, to write letters of apology to each of its underpaid employees and make a “contrition payment” to Monash Oakleigh Legal Service of $10,000.
Because the employer cooperated in the investigation the FWO thought that the best way of ensuring the underpaid employees received their correct pay was by having the employer enter the enforceable undertaking rather than prosecuting.
This case demonstrates the importance of employers knowing and complying with their obligations under a modern award.
If you are an employer who has had an inquiry from the FWO we have the lawyers who can advise you through the process.

Thursday, 30 March 2017

Unfair Dismissals and Penalties




The vast majority of applications for unfair dismissals are discontinued.

Generally, this means that employers and employees have reached agreement so that a formal decision or order of the Fair Work Commission is not required.

Where negotiation does not result in resolution, any order for reinstatement or the payment of compensation made by the Commission can have further consequences for an employer if it is not obeyed.

If you are an employer and ordered to pay $2,200 as compensation for a dismissal found to be unfair, you would be required to pay it even if you needed time to do so and even if you disagreed with the decision.

You would not put yourself in a position where the Fair Work Ombudsman successfully applied to the Federal Circuit Court for $47,000 worth of penalties because your failure to pay $2,200 was a breach of section 405 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

This has happened and is a cautionary reminder to employers.

 

 

 

Thursday, 9 March 2017

Annualised salary and award covered employees



An employer which offers employees contracts with annualised salaries to compensate for all entitlements to which they are entitled under an applicable award needs to beware.
The applicable award may provide that an employer must state in writing which provisions of the award will be satisfied by the payment of the annualised salary.
If the employment contract does not state what entitlements are covered, an employer may find itself facing a claim for overtime, allowances, penalty rates or annual leave loading.
Nevett Ford can assist in avoiding this problem by conducting “health checks” of employee contracts for award covered employees.  

Wednesday, 22 February 2017

Dirty talk costs a career

 
A police officer who was dismissed for serious misconduct for breaches of the New South Wales Police Force Harassment, Discrimination and Bullying Policy and Guidelines has failed in his attempt to have his employment reinstated: Torres v Commissioner of Police.
Serious misconduct was constituted mostly by Mr Torres asking junior colleagues personal and intrusive questions about sexual activity.
Mr Torres had an impressive twenty six years of service including a commendation for bravery.
This, however, was not able to save him.
His explanations that there was a culture of dirty talk where he worked and what he admitted to saying was meant as a joke were not accepted.
Workplaces must be safe for employees. 
Discussions that are sexually explicit and seen as sexually harassing cannot be tolerated.
In this case the employer could point to policy guidelines that made clear the rules and expectations in the workplace.
In our experience many employers do not have appropriate written policies and procedures in place and don’t have proper training to ensure that any policies are implemented.
Employers must educate their employees about how to conduct themselves at work and have clear policies that state what is in and what is out for conversation and behaviour.
Nevett Ford Melbourne lawyers can provide timely and proactive advice to employers on appropriate discipline and dismissal of employees based on misconduct in the workplace.